As media stories emerge about two large-scale charity insider fraudsters being convicted and given long prison sentences, it is a good time for trustees to remind themselves about the potential for ruinous amounts of money to be stolen from charities in this way, and to ensure that they have robust policies and procedures in place to minimise the risk of being targeted by similar criminal activity.
In January this year the treasurer of a social club in Warwickshire was jailed for three years after stealing nearly £400,000 from his employers to fund an online gambling addiction.
Glyn Drabble used a variety of methods to syphon the funds from the club, including a digital payment system set up to divert money from the bar’s card machine to his personal account, applying for a ‘bounce-back’ loan on the club’s behalf, and disguising transfers to his own account as payments to suppliers.
Meanwhile the finance manager of Port Talbot YMCA has also been sent to prison after he stole £310,000 for the charity over a six year period. Andrew Philpin withdrew money on the company credit card, forged signatures on cheques, and created invoices from companies he claimed to have worked for the charity.
Thankfully such large-scale charity fraud is rare, but a report published last year found that a third of all charities had experienced an increase in fraud, with half of all detected frauds perpetrated by staff, members, volunteers, or trustees. Almost two-thirds of charities polled said they expected fraud levels to increase in the next 12 months, largely due to the cost-of-living crisis.
The consequences of such fraud can be devastating: in the case of Port Talbot YMCA, it lost its charitable status and 28 staff members were made redundant. But even if fraud doesn’t cause such an existential crisis, its impact is far-reaching, knocking the confidence of staff, volunteers and funders, as well as the obvious financial damage. And it’s practically impossible to recover funds that are lost to this kind of criminal activity.
More recently, building surveyor, Roger Bryant was jailed for swindling the National Trust out of more than £1m through false invoices. His sons were also found guilty of two charges relating to ‘them knowing – or at least suspecting – the money generated from their own companies by their father was the proceeds of crime’.
So what should charities be doing to prevent such frauds taking place in the first place? There are some obvious steps, especially for smaller charities which may not have the resources to put in place sophisticated anti-fraud measures.
The first is to ensure that there is not an over-reliance on one single person to oversee financial matters. Often this kind of insider fraud is committed by individuals who have manoeuvred themselves into a position where they and only they have oversight of what the charity is spending, enabling them to cover up their activity for significant periods.
The second strategy is to ensure that as an employer, you are looking out for possible ‘red flags’ which might indicate the kind of financial need which often drives such fraudulent activity. Particular things to look out for include gambling addiction (not so easy to spot, admittedly), major changes in an employee’s personal life such as the break-up of a relationship, and lifestyle changes which seem incompatible with an employee’s income such as expensive holidays or flash cars.
None of these things mean that a person is committing fraud, but they do indicate a heightened risk, and being aware of that risk enables trustees to be extra vigilant.
A key part of mitigating such risks is ensuring that your charity has a quality wellbeing programme for staff, which can provide support to prevent problems escalating to the point where a staff member feels out of control.
As ever, the Charity Commission has some very useful guidance for trustees on preventing fraud, and central to that are ten questions for trustees to ask themselves, which are worth repeating here. They should be asking themselves whether they:
understand what fraud is and what their responsibilities are?
understand their financial systems and data, and what ‘normal’ looks like?
encourage staff and volunteers to voice concerns?
run process test checks and observe jobs in action?
promote fraud awareness and understanding?
conduct an annual fraud risk review?
conduct pre-employment screening and in-service checks on staff?
have regular and frank conversations with delivery partners?
have a response plan ready so that everyone knows what to do?
have an anti-fraud policy and code of ethics?
Charity trustees have a duty to manage their organisation’s finances responsibly, and that includes making sure that funds are protected from fraud. It is a sad fact that fraud will always be a risk, and there has never been a more important time to guard against it.
The full Charity Commission guidance on protecting your charity from fraud can be found on the GOV.UK website.
Speak to our specialists for more information
Get in touchRelated news
When would a charity need to consider refusing or returning a donation?
Most charities spend a lot of effort seeking donations – but sometimes they may need to consider refusing a donation, or returning one which has already been made, says Kyle Smith of Lovewell Blake’s Charities team.
Academies Accounts Direction
The ESFA have now released the Academies Accounts Direction 2023 – 2024 for academy trust accounts ending 31 August 2024, along with model accounts and the auditor framework and guide.